Legal Opinion

Ebel v. Drum

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 27, 1944No. 2290PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, District Judge.

Although the caption of this motion is “Defendants’ Motion for Permission to Adduce Additional Evidence”, yet, in reality, it is a motion to reopen the case and to permit the defendants to file a supplemental answer together with the right to present additional evidence with respect to the proposed supplementary matter.

This case was entered in this court April 29, 1943, and a full trial was had on the merits on August 4, 1943. On September 20, 1943, this court handed down its opinion (52 F.Supp. 189) and ordered a decree in the plaintiff’s favor. No decree has as yet been…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Yarnell v. Hillsborough Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  4. City of Texarkana v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Berssenbrugge v. Luce Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Manual De J. Gomez v. Jerry v. Wilson, Chief of PoliceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. State of Wisconsin, Cross-Appellant v. Odric Baker, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Kern v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  4. United States v. Genevieve RussellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
  5. United States v. L. D. Caulk Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API