Legal Opinion

Bush v. Pioneer Mining Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 2, 1910No. 1,755PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

Error is assigned to the rejection of the deposition of Alexander and of his deed to the plaintiff in error, made after the commencement of the action. In ejectment the plaintiff must recover, if at all, upon the state of his title as it subsisted at the time of the commencement of the action. Evidence of any after-acquired title is inadmissible, unless the foundation therefor has been laid by a supplemental complaint, under the authority of a statute which permits the filing thereof in actions at law. There is such authority in section 98, p. 164, Carter’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reily v. LancasterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Hardy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  3. Musselman v. ManlyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Kahn v. Old Telegraph Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Johnson v. BriscoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. L. D. Caulk Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1953
  2. Eveland v. Detroit Machine Tool Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1927
  3. Smith v. WheelerDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API