Legal Opinion

People v. Crowley

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1893No. 21028PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

The appellant was informed and convicted of the crime of an attempt to commit burglary, and he appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. There are only two points made by appellant which need special notice—. which points, by the way, are not discussed in the brief of respondent.

1. The charge is that appellant feloniously attempted to enter the house of one Patrick Kenny with intent to commit larceny, and it is contended that the court erroneously refused to give an instruction to the jury to the effect that if he attempted to enter the. house forcibly, with the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. RozelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. People v. McGungillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. The People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. AmmermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. People v. GillilandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. People v. GarrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API