Legal Opinion

Kline v. Byram

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 22, 1927No. 26,155PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The appeal is from an order denying defendants’ motion in the alternative for judgment non obstante veredicto or a new trial.

The action was to recover damages for bodily injuries plaintiff received in defendants’ employ through their alleged negligence. Defendants, as receivers of the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, were operating that railway in this state, and for that purpose used a roundhouse in Minnéapolis. This roundhouse was equipped with 46 stalls. Under each stall was a pit to facilitate such ordinary repair work and adjustment as might be needed on a locomotive after…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. De AtleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. WilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ProffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Frese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Davis v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cox v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Roeder v. North American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Fogelsong v. JarmanOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Stritzke v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Cox v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API