Kline v. Byram
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The appeal is from an order denying defendants’ motion in the alternative for judgment non obstante veredicto or a new trial.
The action was to recover damages for bodily injuries plaintiff received in defendants’ employ through their alleged negligence. Defendants, as receivers of the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, were operating that railway in this state, and for that purpose used a roundhouse in Minnéapolis. This roundhouse was equipped with 46 stalls. Under each stall was a pit to facilitate such ordinary repair work and adjustment as might be needed on a locomotive after…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. De AtleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. WilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ProffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Frese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Davis v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cox v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Roeder v. North American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Fogelsong v. JarmanOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Stritzke v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Cox v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929