Legal Opinion
Stritzke v. Chicago Great Western Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 15, 1933No. 29,667PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 251 N.W. 532. Action to recover for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while in the employ of the defendant. There was a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $3,000. There was a motion by the defendant for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. It was denied. There was no motion for a new trial. Judgment was entered on the verdict. The defendant appeals from the judgment.
1. A motion for a directed verdict or for judgment notwithstanding the verdict presents a question of law. The court does not weigh the evidence. It does not determine the credibility of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Unadilla Valley Railway Co. v. CaldineSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Seamer v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. DriggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Boyer v. Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Thompson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Levasseur v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Thom v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Schneider v. the Texas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Jude v. JudeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Ganser v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.