Fogelsong v. Jarman
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, C. J.
At approximately 8:20 a. m. on the 5th day of March, 1940, plaintiff was riding in an automobile being driven in an easterly direction across Pacific Highway 99E at its intersection with Hull Avenue.
Pacific Highway 99E was then and still is a public highway extending in a general northerly and southerly direction.
Hull Avenue was and is also a public highway extending in a general easterly and westerly direction and intersecting Pacific Highway 99E at approximately right angles.
As the automobile in which plaintiff was riding so being operated across said intersection, defendant Charles Homann…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- St. Andrassy v. MooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Otero v. Soto Ex Rel. GonzalesArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Nark v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Rockenstein v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Bales v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chesterman v. BarmonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Chesterman v. BarmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Crosby v. Braley & Graham, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Sievers v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1961
- Chesterman v. BarmonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.