Legal Opinion

Florida Tomato Exchange v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 24, 2015No. Slip Op. 15-108; Court 13-00148PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

EATON, Judge:

This matter is before the court on plaintiff The Florida Tomato Exchange’s (the “Tomato Exchange” or “plaintiff’) USCIT Rule 56.2 motion for judgment on the agency record. See PL’s Rule 56.2 Mot. for J. on the Agency R. (ECF Dkt. No. 30) (“PL’s Mot.”). Plaintiff is a trade association representing growers and first handlers of the domestic like product of the subject merchandise. 1 See Summons ¶ 1 (ECF Dkt. No. 1). By its motion, plaintiff challenges the United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or the “Department”) agreement with producers and exporters…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Yangzhou Bestpak Gifts & Crafts Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  2. Xinjiamei Furniture (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  3. Itochu Building Products v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  4. AIMCOR v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Florida Tomato Exchange v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API