Legal Opinion

Florida Tomato Exchange v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 25, 2017No. Slip Op. 17-114; Court 13-00148Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

Eaton, Judge:

This case involves a determination by the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or the “Department”) to enter into a suspension agreement with exporters of fresh tomatoes from Mexico to “eliminate completely the injurious effect of exports to the United States of the subject merchandise,” pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1673c(c) (2012). 1 Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico: Suspension of Antidumping Investigation, 78 Fed. Reg. 14,967, 14,968 (Dep’t Commerce Mar. 8, 2013) (“2013 Suspension Agreement” or “2013 Agreement”). In Florida Tomato Exchange v. United States, 39…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  2. Ipsco, Inc., and Ipsco Steel, Inc. v. The United States, Lone Star Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Viraj Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  4. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
  5. PPG Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API