Legal Opinion
AIMCOR v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 9, 1998No. Nos. 96-1502, 97-1009PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
This antidumping action stems from the investigation of ferrosilicon1 imported from Brazil. Plaintiffs/Cross-Appellants, AIM-COR, Aabama Silicon, Inc., American Alloys, Inc., Globe Metallurgical, Inc., and American Silicon Technologies (collectively “AIM-COR”), are United States ferrosilicon producers, manufacturers, or resellers. Defendant/Appellant, Companhia Ferroligas Minas Gerais-Minasligas (“Minasligas”), is a Brazilian producer and exporter of ferrosilicon. Minasligas appeals the decision of the United States Court of International Trade sustaining the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Koyo Seiko Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Nsk Ltd. And Nsk Corporation v. The United States, and Federal-Mogul Corporation, and the Torrington CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Nation Ford Chemical Company v. United States, and Yude Chemical Company, Zhenxing Chemical Industry Company and Pht International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Altx, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Sango International, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Altx, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.