Legal Opinion

Ephraims v. Murdock

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1843PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ERROR to the Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

— Debt by the plaintiffs against the defendant. The declaration contains three counts. The first and second are upon an instrument of writing, by which the defendant acknowledged that he had received, by the hand of John Stewart, 200 dollars in favour of the plaintiffs, &c. The third is for money had and received. Special demurrers to the first and second counts, and nil debet pleaded to the third. The Court sustained the demurrers. Verdict and judgment for the defendant.

The demurrers to the first and second counts were correctly sustained. They do not show, in sufficient terms, a contract…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Summons v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Johnston v. GriestIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. United States v. MacombU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · 1851
  4. Horne v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Ward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1846

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API