Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Griest

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 10,175PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The instrument upon which the appellant’s complaint is founded reads thus:

*504“January 1st, 1876.
“ This will certify that I do give to Charles E. Johnston $ 100, the money to be paid as soon as my financial condition will allow; and if Í do not live to pay it, I wish it paid out of my estate.” (Signed) “ Edward F. Griest.”

The questions presented are these:. First. Is the instrument a promise to pay money, or is it a promise to make a gift ?

Second. Is it so ambiguous as to make its construction depend upon extrinsic facts ?

Of these in their order.. If the words “ I do give ” are not qualified by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson School Township v. FarlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Johnston Harvester Co. v. BartleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Judy v. GilbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Kimble v. ChristieIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mescall v. TullyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Long v. StrausIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Daugherty v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Oolitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. McIntosh v. ZaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API