Legal Opinion
Gillam v. Parker
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Decided April 18, 1927No. 415PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERNEST F. COCHRAN, District Judge.
The plaintiff filed a bill in equity against the defendants and caused to be issued gnd served upon them a subpoena ad respondendum in the usual form. The bill alleges substantially that the plaintiff is the master of the schooner Vinces, a citizen of Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, and a subject of Great Britain; that the defendant Parker is the United States collector of customs for the port of Charleston, S. C.; that the defendant Meyer is the United States attorney for the Eastern district of South Carolina, actively in charge of prosecutions instituted by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex Parte EastonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Slocum v. MayberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- In Re FassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Standard Carpet Co. v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
- Jervey v. The CarolinaDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Raffaele v. Granger, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- In Re BehrensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- The WhippoorwillDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1931
- (PC) Kyle Nargiz v. ShermanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021