Legal Opinion

The Whippoorwill

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 19, 1931No. Nos. 1853, 1854PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

The matter now before the court in both the above-entitled cases, arises on exceptions to ratification of sales in the respective cases. Exceptions to the sale were filed by the United States of America on the ground, that the sale price was grossly inadequate and also that the yachts were respectively in the custody of the collector of customs consequent upon the seizure and pending the filing of libel proceedings for forfeiture for violation of the customs laws at the time of the attachment in the original libel proceedings in this ease; and for that reasoh it is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. De Lima v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. James L. v. CarrylSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  4. In Re FassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Harris v. DennieSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yokohama Specie Bank v. Chengting T. WangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. The OlympiaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1932
  3. The DonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1932
  4. C. Hiltebrant Dry Dock Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API