Legal Opinion
(PC) Kyle Nargiz v. Sherman
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 1, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01173Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KYLE NARGIZ, 1:19-cv-01173-AWI-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE 13 vs. PROCEED AGAINST DEFENDANTS SHERMAN AND MILAN FOR ADVERSE 14 STUART SHERMAN, et al., CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT UNDER THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT, AND 15 Defendants. DISMISSING ALL OTHER CLAIMS (ECF No. 13.) 16 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) 17 DAYS 18 19 20 21 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 Kyle Nargiz (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 24 pauperis with this civil rights…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.