Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McLeod v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 2, 2012No. CR-11-0860Published

1ConcurrenceWelch, Judge

I concur in the result reached in the majority’s opinion.

I

The State’s legitimate lack of opportunity to plead procedural bars, and recognition that the State did not waive the bar, does not relieve this Court of the obligation to conduct the extraordinary circumstance analysis mandated by Ex parte Clemons before sua sponte applying procedural bars.

I believe that the majority has failed to follow the plain mandate of Ex parte Clemons, 55 So.3d 348 (Ala.2007). I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that because the State had no opportunity to respond in the trial court, it did not waive the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Ben Gary Triestman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API