Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pacek

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 13, 1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (“Commonwealth”) appeals from the January 26, 1996 trial court suppression order granting defendant-appellee Steven Dennis Pacek’s (“Pacek”) motion to suppress the results of field sobriety tests and an intoxilyzer test performed upon Pacek.

During June and July, 1994, Monroeville (Municipality of Monroeville, PA) Police Assistant Chief Leonard Tinsley reviewed Monroeville Police statistics regarding driving under the influence (“DUI”) related traffic accidents on Pennsylvania Route 22 (also known as William Penn Highway) in Monroe-ville during…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TarbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. BlouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. ZiegelmeierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. KendallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. DunkleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Weiley v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. KitchenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. WilmingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. RastogiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. WorthySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API