Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kendall

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 1, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

Tammy Lou Kendall and Natalie L. Peek, drivers of two separate vehicles, were each stopped at the same field sobriety checkpoint (the checkpoint). Subsequently, Kendall and Peek were found guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). Kendall was also convicted of possessing marijuana. Both Kendall and Peck challenge the constitutionality of the checkpoint. In addition, Kendall asserts that the marijuana found following a search of her purse should have been suppressed. We affirm the judgments of sentence for the DUI convictions, but we reverse Kendall’s judgment of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TarbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. BlouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. BrundidgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. MyrtetusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. MacEkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PacekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Com. v. Brophy-Desante, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. BaerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. BaerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API