Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Worthy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FORD ELLIOTT, J.:

¶ 1 In this appeal, the Commonwealth challenges the October 19, 2004 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County granting Mark S. Worthy’s (“Worthy”) motion to suppress evidence obtained after his vehicle was stopped at a sobriety checkpoint roadblock.1 The trial court held that the checkpoint at issue failed to adhere to the Tarbert-Blouse criteria.2 We agree and affirm.

11 2 When we review the Commonwealth’s appeal from the decision of the suppression court, “[we] consider only the evidence from the defendant’s witnesses together with the evidence of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. NesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. TarbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. BlouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. ValentinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WorthySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. In re J.A.K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. WorthySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. WorthySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. WorthySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API