Legal Opinion
Oak Construction Company v. Huron Cement Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1973No. 72-1853PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant cement company in a Robinson-Patman action, 15 U.S.C. § 13(a), (d), and (e), to recover treble damages for injuries resulting from unlawful price discrimination.
The record reveals that a counterclaim for non-payment of a contract debt was filed by defendant but has not yet been adjudicated. Since all the claims before the court were not decided in the grant of summary judgment, that order is interlocutory. Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Brunsing, 378 F.2d 234 (9th Cir. 1967); 6 J. Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 54.35[1],…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- David v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Rex L. BrunsingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Williams v. Bernhardt Bros. Tugboat Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
3Cited by84 opinions
- Robert Lewis v. B.F. Goodrich Company Daniel Newsome Roy AilstockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Ladonna Harrison v. Edison Brothers Apparel Stores, Incorporated, and Melvin Wall, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Coy E. Kirtland v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Columbia Gulf Transmission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Arnold R. Jago, Superintendent v. United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division at Cleveland, and Harllel B. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Joseph W. Moody v. Norman F. KapicaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.