Legal Opinion

Evans v. Paige

California Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1894No. 18130PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order denying his motion for a new trial. In the brief of counsel for appellant it is said that “ the main question involved is the validity of an attachment and sale under execution of an equity of redemption or other equitable interest in even numbered sections of land adjoining each other only at the corners, upon only one of which sections was posted the notice required by the statute to be posted upon the land, in the absence of any occupant.”

It is also argued that the complaint is defective, because it contains no averment of facts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. De Toro v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Jacks v. BuellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Estate of RedfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. O'Moore v. DriscollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Petaluma Paving Co. v. SingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Lambert v. MarcuseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Melvin v. E. B. A. L. Stone Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API