Legal Opinion

Melvin v. E. B. A. L. Stone Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1908No. Civ. No. 441PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.

The first and probably most important point urged for a reversal of the order grows out of the action of the court in allowing plaintiff, over the objection of defendants, to file a supplemental complaint.

The action was brought to obtain an injunction preventing defendants, among other things, from blasting, excavating or removing earth or rock on and from a certain block in the city of Oakland, designated as block 70, in which is situate the lot and dwelling-house of plaintiff, so as to deprive the lot of plaintiff of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Miller v. CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Jacob v. LorenzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Candler v. PettitNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
  5. Bode v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cooper v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API