In re Estate of Redfield
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
When this cause was pending in Department, an opinion was prepared by Commissioner Britt, and concurred in by Commissioners Vanclief and Haynes. The case was subsequently ordered into Bank. After a full hearing by the court, and a careful examination of the entire case, we are satisfied that we cannot give better expression of our views than by adopting Commissioner Britt’s opinion, which we accordingly do; and, for the reasons therein stated, the order appealed from is reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
The following is Commissioner Britt’s opinion:
Britt, C.
Mary A.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In re Estate of McDevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Edington v. . Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Morrison v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Herwick v. LangfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Carpenter v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Estate of PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Long Beach City High School District v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Finkler v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re Estate of RelphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.