State v. Sincell, Unpublished Decision (4-12-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
This appeal is brought by the State of Ohio pursuant to Crim.R. 12(J) from an order of the court of common pleas sustaining defendant-appellee Jacqlyn Sincell's motion to suppress evidence that police had seized from her purse in the course of an arrest. The State contends that the trial court erred in not finding that this evidence is admissible under the inevitable discovery doctrine.
We conclude that the police acted reasonably in retrieving Sincell's purse from the front seat of a truck, in which she had been observed committing an act of prostitution. There was no reason to believe…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. GuysingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. KleinOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. PerkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Forest Cartage Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.