Legal Opinion

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Forest Cartage Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 1990No. Case 56734PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J.

On August 22, 1986 Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail") instituted this action against Forest Cartage, Inc, Ronald J. Smoker, John N. Smoker, Smoker & Son (collectively "Forest Cartage") and St. Paul Fire and Marines Insurance Co. ("St. Paul") alleging it was a "protected person" under the St. Paul insurance policy and indemnity clause in its contract with Forest Cartage and demanding a defense and indemnification as a result of a fatal accident to a Conrail employee. Both parties moved for summary judgment which was granted in favor of defendants Forest Cartage et al. On November 18,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Pitts v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Miller v. LintOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Atkinson v. Grumman Ohio Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miamisburg Motel v. Huntington National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Bluffs of Wildwood Homeowners' Assn. v. DinkelOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. World Diamond, Inc. v. Hyatt Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Verandah Properties, Inc. v. Ullman Oil Co., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Custom Utilicom, Inc. v. Cornerstone Installations, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API