Legal Opinion
Murray v. McNamara
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 11, 1951PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
Petitioners-appellants, two of the persons who passed an open competitive examination for the position of paver, seek, in this article 78 proceeding, an order directing respondents, who constitute the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, (1) to remove certain persons from the paver list on the ground that such persons did not have five years’ satisfactory experience as paver or a satisfactory equivalent, and to nullify all certifications of such persons for the position; (2) to nullify all proceedings had with reference to a promotion examination for rammer; and (3) to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Matter of Cowen v. ReavyNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Matter of Williams v. MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- People Ex Rel. Moriarty v. . CreelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Strauss v. HannigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Matter of Strauss v. HannigNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wirzberger v. WatsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Altman v. LangNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Roske v. KeyesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- D'Amico v. LeonardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- English v. McCoyNew York Supreme Court · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.