Legal Opinion
Altman v. Lang
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1965PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Seymour Bieber,
Spec. Ref. Petitioners seek to restrain respondents from appointing persons to the position of probation officer without competitive examination or pursuant to notice of examination No. 9-542, which, in effect, adopted and employed the unassembled technique of testing.
After a finding at Special' Term that the submitted papers made necessary a trial of the issues regarding whether “the requirements of the Constitution of the State of New York pertaining to the matter herein have been met ” (Matter of Altman v. Lang, Spec. Term, Part I, Levy, J., Feb. 28, 1963), upon consent of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Fink v. FineganNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- People Ex Rel. Sweet v. . LymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Matter of Meenagh v. DeweyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Murray v. McNamaraNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Matter of McNamara v. HollingNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chance v. Board of ExaminersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Keyer v. Civil Service Commission of City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
- Chance v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- 7 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1207, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9288 Boston M. Chance v. The Board of Education of the City of New York, the Board of Examiners, Charles Wiener (Pro Se), Proposed Defendant-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Bobrowich v. PostonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.