Legal Opinion

English v. McCoy

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel J. Silverman, J.

Three article 78 CPLR proceedings have been brought attacking the action of the Administrative Board of the Judicial Conference of the State of New York (hereinafter Administrative Board or respondent) in directing promotion and open competitive examinations for certain positions in the unified court system in the City of New York. Although the court does not deem it advisable to consolidate the three proceedings, the court finds it convenient to discuss them together.

The examinations attacked are for the positions of Court Clerk I; Assistant Court Clerk; and Senior Court Officer.

PRELIMINARY…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York Foreign Trade Zone Operators, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Wirzberger v. WatsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Cornehl v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. Murray v. McNamaraNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Matter of Mendelson v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Quirk v. EvansNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  2. English v. McCoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. Blyn v. BartlettNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. English v. McCoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API