Legal Opinion

State v. Strommen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 8, 2002No. C9-00-1930PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

Appellant Douglas Strommen was convicted of attempted robbery in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 609.17, subd. 1, 609.24 (2000). 1 He appealed the conviction, alleg ing several errors, including errors in jury instruction, prosecutorial misconduct, erroneous admission of evidence, insufficient evidence, and ineffective assistance of counsel. On appeal, the court of appeals concluded that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on accomplice testimony, but that the error was harmless. The court of appeals also concluded that the trial court erred by admitting…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. NorgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API