Transamerica Corp. v. Parrington
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PATROSSO, J. pro tem.
Plaintiff instituted these three separate actions seeking specific performance of an agreement executed by each of the defendants for the sale of corporate shares. The causes were consolidated and pursuant to stipulation were disposed of by a single set of findings and judgment. Defendants appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff upon the sole ground that the agreements in question are illegal and hence unenforceable.
In May, 1941, respondent (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Transamerica) acquired all of the stock, both common and preferred, of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Shaughnessy v. EidsmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- In Re the Elections of Directors of George Ringler & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Warner Bros. Pictures v. BrodelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Landberg v. LandbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Pac. Etc. Dev. Corp. v. Western Pac. RR Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Schmidt v. BeckelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Pacific Southwest Development Corp. v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Spielberg v. GranzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.