Legal Opinion

Oil Heat Institute v. Town of Mulkilteo

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1970No. 40472PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claim that ordinance No. 153 of the town of Mukilteo is “unconstitutional and void, illegal, improper and of no force or effect.”

We do not reach the merits of the claim alleged. The sole question before us on summary judgment is whether the trial court correctly determined that no material question of fact is presented by the record.

Plaintiff, Oil Heat Institute of Washington, Inc., is a trade organization established to promote the oil heat industry. *2Other plaintiffs are fuel oil retailers doing business in the town of Mukilteo.

Ordina…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Balise v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Stull v. De MattosWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Garfinkle v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Wells & Wade Hardware, Inc. v. City of WenatcheeWashington Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Shannon v. Pay 'N Save Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Laudermilk v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API