Legal Opinion

In Re Illinois Bell Switching Station Litigation

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1994No. 73999PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

This case arose after a telephone switching station caught fire, allegedly due to the negligent or willful failure of Illinois Bell Telephone Company to take adequate fire-prevention measures. The fire left the affected class (plaintiffs) without telephone services for about a month. Plaintiffs now seek to recover the economic damages they incurred from that loss of service.

At issue is whether this statutory action for civil damages brought against Illinois Bell Telephone Company (Bell) is barred by either Illinois’ "economic loss doctrine” or an exculpatory clause in Bell’s tariff filed with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Kraft, Inc. v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Barthel v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Waters v. Pacific Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  5. City of East St. Louis v. Union Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. In Re Chicago Flood LitigationIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Adams v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Woods v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Wade v. City of North Chicago Police Pension BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Trans States Airlines v. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API