Legal Opinion
Wade v. City of North Chicago Police Pension Board
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided November 1, 2007No. 101265PublishedCited by 144 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Karmeier
Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Freeman, Fitzgerald, Garman, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.
Justice Kilbride took no part in the decision.
OPINION
Plaintiff, Lawrence Wade, filed an application for a disability pension with defendant, the City of North Chicago Police Pension Board (Board). At the commencement of plaintiffs hearing before the Board, plaintiffs counsel requested limited consideration for a “duty-related disability pension” only, pursuant to section 3 — 114.1 of the Illinois Pension Code (Code) (40 ILCS 5/3 — 114.1 (West 2002)). Following a hearing, the Board…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Adams v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
- DeLuna v. BurciagaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- Exelon Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- County of Du Page v. Illinois Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- Provena Covenant Medical Center v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- Kouzoukas v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- Roselle Police Pension Board v. Village of RoselleIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.