Oregon Bankers Ass'n v. State
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
Petitioners1 challenge the validity of three administrative rules adopted after enactment of the Parental Leave Law (the statute) in 1987.2 We uphold the validity of two of the challenged rules but conclude that one is invalid in part.
The statute mandates unpaid parental leave for up to 12 weeks after the birth of an employee’s3 infant. ORS 659.360(1); ORS 659.360(6).4 The legislature directed the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) to enforce the statute. ORS 659.365(1).5 BOLI has promulgated rules: OAR 839-07-800 through OAR 839-07-875. Petitioners contend that three…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Hay v. Oregon Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Miller v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Robinson v. School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- OREGON BANKERS v. Bureau of Labor & Ind.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Alto v. State Ex Rel. State Fire MarshalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Hopkins v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Alto v. State Ex Rel. State Fire MarshalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.