Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 13, 1994No. CA A80229PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

Petitioner seeks a “declaratory ruling binding between the agency and petitioner for retroactive application of’ OAR 291-97-020(7).1 His claim would appear to be based on ORS 183.410, which provides for binding agency rulings as to the applicability of an agency rule to a state of facts. Although an agency’s ruling made under that statute is subject to review in the Court of Appeals, we do not have original jurisdiction over such a claim. Petitioner cites ORS 183.480 as the source of the court’s jurisdiction to review the administrative rule. That statute confers jurisdiction for our review…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Oregon Bankers Ass'n v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. OREGON BANKERS v. Bureau of Labor & Ind.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re FordiceMississippi Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API