Legal Opinion

Hense v. G.D. Searle & Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 21, 1990No. 88-1429PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

This appeal and cross-appeal arise out of a products liability action brought against the manufacturer of an intrauterine contraception device. The controversy centers on the parties’ dispute over the method by which plaintiff should conduct discovery of the corporate defendant’s 750,000 product-related documents. The wrangling has resulted in six continuances of trial over the six-year life of the litigation.

When plaintiff’s request for a seventh continuance was denied on the eve of trial, she invited the court to reconsider its earlier order denying summary judgment for the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. Garcia v. PeeplesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co. v. RoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  5. Taylor v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Osztreicher v. JuanteguyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Kysar v. BP Am. Prod. Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Washington Bancorporation v. SaidDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
  4. Montgomery Ward Development Corp. ex rel. Ad Valorem Tax, Inc. v. Cedar Rapids Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. Rancho Del Villacito Condominiums, Inc. v. WeisfeldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API