Legal Opinion
In re Pilling
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 1, 1930No. 2507PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of the court:
This is an appeal from a rejection by the Patent Office of claims numbered 9, 10, and 11, in appellant’s application for a patent, serial No. 736824, filed September 10, 1924. These claims were rejected by both the examiner and the Board of Appeals, and are as follows:
9. An alloy consisting of nickel, copper, and manganese which has a substantially zero temperature coefficient of resistance in which the nickel is more than 45% and less than 50%, the copper is less than 35% and more than. 10%, and the manganese is 20% to 40%.
10. An…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Saranac Lake Electric Light Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1901
- Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Elliott-Fisher Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908
3Cited by4 opinions
- Donner v. Sheer Pharmacal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Dix-Seal Corporation v. New Haven Trap Rock CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1964
- In Re CooperCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- In Re RichterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931