Legal Opinion
Moore v. Czerniak
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 28, 2008No. 04-15713PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Concurrence by Judge BERZON; Dissent by Judge BYBEE.
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Randy Moore’s taped confession was obtained by the police at the station house by means that even the state concedes were unconstitutional. It does not contest on this appeal the district court’s finding that Moore’s confession was involuntary. As the Supreme Court has declared emphatically, “[a] confession is like no other evidence. Indeed, ‘the defendant’s own confession is probably the most probative and damaging evidence that can be admitted against him.’ ” Arizona v. Fulminante, 499…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Moore v. CzerniakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Doody v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Madrigal v. YatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- United States v. BegayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Oliva v. HedgpethDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.