Legal Opinion
Madrigal v. Yates
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 3, 2009No. Case CV 07-7251-GAF (MLG)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND GRANTING CONDITIONAL WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
GARY A. FEESS, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the petition and all of the records and files herein, as well as the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were filed.
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lopez v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Spearman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Roger Saesee v. Mike McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Christopher Bahtuoh v. Michelle SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Williams v. WoodfordDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.