Legal Opinion

United States v. Begay

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 1, 2009No. 07-10487PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-appellant Kenderick Begay appeals his convictions of two first-degree murders in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153, 1111 and of two counts of using a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). Begay’s principal argument on appeal is that the evidence introduced at trial, when taken in the light most favorable to the government, fails to establish that he committed a “premeditated killing.” 18 U.S.C. § 1111. Because we agree that the government failed to introduce evidence sufficient to show premeditation — an essential element…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Randly BegayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. United States v. BegayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. BegayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. BegayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. HoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API