Legal Opinion
Hardy v. United of Omaha Life Insurance
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided December 3, 1999No. 5:98-cv-00025PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Mary A. Hardy (“Hardy”), has sued Defendant, United of Omaha Life Insurance Company (“United of Omaha”), for breach of contract and violation of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, M.C.L. §§ 445.901 to .922. The parties have filed Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.
Facts
The facts in this case are almost entirely undisputed. The Plaintiffs husband, Mr. James Hardy, was an employee of the State of Michigan stationed in the office of the Family Independence Agency in Alle-gan, Michigan. Mr. Hardy’s job involved driving to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Powers v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DirecTV, Inc. v. KarpinskyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003