Legal Opinion

Hay v. Baumgartner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 2007No. 43A04-0612-CV-741PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Plaintiff, Stephen M. Hay (Hay), appeals the trial court’s Order, concluding that he had a revocable license to use a shared driveway and denying his request for equitable injunctive relief against Appellees-Defendants, Ronald and Gloria Baumgartner (the Baumgartners).

We affirm.

ISSUE

Hay raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as follows: Whether the trial court erred when it found that a driveway shared between two properties was subject to a revocable license instead of an irrevocable license.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On or about May…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Briles v. Wausau Insurance CompaniesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Nowlin v. WhippleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Contel of Indiana, Inc. v. CoulsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Closson Lumber Co., Inc. v. WisemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Industrial Disposal Corp. of America v. City of East Chicago, Department of Water WorksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of Mueller v. KarnsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Hay v. BaumgartnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Murray v. City of LawrenceburgIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Ramer v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Close Armstrong LLC v. Trunkline Gas CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API