Hay v. Baumgartner
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant-Plaintiff, Stephen M. Hay (Hay), appeals the trial court’s Order, concluding that he had a revocable license to use a shared driveway and denying his request for equitable injunctive relief against Appellees-Defendants, Ronald and Gloria Baumgartner (the Baumgartners).
We affirm.
ISSUE
Hay raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as follows: Whether the trial court erred when it found that a driveway shared between two properties was subject to a revocable license instead of an irrevocable license.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On or about May…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Briles v. Wausau Insurance CompaniesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Nowlin v. WhippleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Contel of Indiana, Inc. v. CoulsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Closson Lumber Co., Inc. v. WisemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Industrial Disposal Corp. of America v. City of East Chicago, Department of Water WorksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Estate of Mueller v. KarnsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hay v. BaumgartnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Murray v. City of LawrenceburgIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Ramer v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Close Armstrong LLC v. Trunkline Gas CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.