Legal Opinion
Briles v. Wausau Insurance Companies
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 12, 2006No. 10A04-0605-CV-244PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant-Petitioner, Daniel V. Briles (Briles), appeals the trial court's denial of his Motion to Correct Error contending that the trial court erred by concluding in its declaratory judgment that Appellee-Respondent, Wausau Insurance Companies (Wausau), is not obligated to provide coverage under the terms of its insurance policy.
We affirm.
ISSUE
Briles raises four issues on appeal which we consolidate and restate as the following single issue: Whether Maurice Cooper's use of Musselman Hotels' shuttle van was within the permissive use as contemplated by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. MetzlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Warner Trucking, Inc. v. Carolina Casualty InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Gregg v. CooperIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Horace A. Arnold, as Administrator of the Estate of Robert Eugene Arnold v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GontermanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Buckeye State Mutual Insurance Co. v. CarfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Argonaut Insurance Co. v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Wellpoint, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. BeattyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. v. Marsh Supermarkets, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.