Legal Opinion
Hay v. Baumgartner
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 9, 2009No. 43A03-0810-CV-484PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARNES, Judge.
Case Summary
Stephen Hay appeals the trial court's order granting $13,488.19 in attorney fees pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 65(C) to Ronald and Gloria Baumgartner. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Issue
Hay raises multiple issues, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court abused its discretion in awarding the Baumgartners the full amount of attorney fees accrued during the litigation between the parties.
Facts
Hay and the Baumgartners own adjoining lots in Syracuse. Apparently, the previous owners of the respective properties shared a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- PSI Energy, Inc. v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Robson v. Texas Eastern Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Gleeson v. Preferred Sourcing, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Helms v. Carmel High School Vocational Building Trades Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Weber County v. Ogden TreceUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re RUETH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, an Indiana Limited PartnershipIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- William R. Harr and Finster Courier, Inc. d/b/a Elite Express v. Julian Hayes and Tracey HayesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Gaume v. N.M. Interstate Stream Comm'nNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- Ford Motor Credit Company LLC v. Fincannon Ford IncDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.