Legal Opinion
Murray v. City of Lawrenceburg
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 2009No. 15A04-0803-CV-122PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATHIAS, Judge.
Gloria Murray et al. ("the Plaintiffs") brought suit against the City of Lawrence ("the City"), the Lawrenceburg Conser-vancey District ("the Conservancy District"), and Indiana Gaming Company, LP. ("Indiana Gaming") (collectively "the Defendants"), claiming ownership of a certain portion of land being used by the Defendants. The Defendants filed a motion for a judgment on the pleadings, which the trial court denied. The trial court then denied the Plaintiffs' demand for a jury trial. The Plaintiffs now bring this interlocutory appeal and claim that the trial court erred…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Woodward v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Nehi Beverage Co., Inc. v. PetriIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Terpstra v. Farmers and Merchants BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Dible v. City of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Monnett v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Murray v. City of LawrenceburgIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- T-3 Martinsville, LLC v. U.S. Holding, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Bishop v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BENDIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Murray v. City of LawrenceburgIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009