Legal Opinion

Rikard v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 9, 2003No. CR 03-54PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

Appellants Gwendolyn Rikard and Stacy Dino Darnell appeal from their convictions for drug-related offenses. Rikard was sentenced to 120 months’ probation fpr possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, and Darnell was sentenced to 126 months’ imprisonment for simultaneous possession of drugs and firearms followed by five years’ suspended imposition of sentence. Both appellants entered conditional pleas of guilty in which they reserved the right to appeal the denial of their motion to suppress evidence under Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3(b). Their sole point on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. State v. BolandWashington Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Litchfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. SchwartzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State of Minnesota v. David Ford McMurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Barekman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. RankenSuperior Court of Delaware · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API