Legal Opinion

Barekman v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 2009No. S-08-0119PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Darin C. Barekman pleaded guilty to one count of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, marijuana, while reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized from his trash. In his motion, and on appeal, he claimed the search of his trash without a warrant violated his right to be free from unreasonable searches, as protected by the United States and Wyoming constitutions. We hold the search did not violate Mr. Ba-rekman's constitutional rights and affirm the denial of his suppression motion.

ISSUE

[¶ 2] The issue for our…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Litchfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. AyalaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. BolandWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. HempeleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. State of Minnesota v. David Ford McMurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Tucker v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. RankenSuperior Court of Delaware · 2010
  5. Maria Anne Joseph v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API