Legal Opinion
Haney v. City Court in & for the City of Empire
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 18, 1989No. 88SA123PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vollack
C. Dale Haney filed this pro se appeal from the district court’s order denying his request for relief in the nature of prohibition under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) and awarding attorney fees against him in favor of the town of Empire. We affirm.
I
In October 1986, C. Dale Haney (Haney or the defendant) was driving in the town of Empire when he was stopped by an officer and issued a summons and complaint for traveling at 39 miles per hour (mph) in a 25 mph zone, in violation of Empire Municipal Code section 4-1. The summons and complaint required that Haney appear in Empire Municipal Court.1 When he…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Western United Realty, Inc. v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Parrish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Retallack v. Police Court of City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Schoonover v. Hedlund Abstract Co., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Two G's, Inc. v. KalbinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
3Cited by15 opinions
- Colorado Supply Co., Inc. v. StewartColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Fasing v. LaFondColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Bockar v. PattersonColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Nagy v. LandauColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Sullivan v. LutzColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.