Legal Opinion

Schoonover v. Hedlund Abstract Co., Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 1986No. 85CA0593PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Judge.

Defendant, Hedlund Abstract Company, Inc., appeals from the trial court order denying attorney fees and costs following plaintiff’s confession of defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

On June 1, 1984, plaintiff commenced this C.R.C.P. 105 proceeding seeking a complete adjudication of the rights of certain parties with respect to real property located in Lincoln County, Colorado. The proceeding was allegedly necessitated by defendant’s issuance of a document which erroneously listed the owners of mineral interests in the property.

A hearing on an amended motion for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Western United Realty, Inc. v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Mission Denver Co. v. PiersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. State, Department of RevenueColorado Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. T.L. Roofing, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Schmidt Construction Co. v. Becker-Johnson Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Haney v. City Court in & for the City of EmpireSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Weber v. WallaceColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc. v. HeggeColorado Court of Appeals · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API