Legal Opinion
Fasing v. LaFond
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 1997No. 95CA0927PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DAVIDSON.
In this dispute arising from a failed contingent fee agreement, defendant, Richard C. LaFond, appeals from a judgment of the trial court dismissing, pursuant to C.R.C.P 12(b)(5), his counterclaims for recovery of contingent fees based on a theory of promissory estoppel, and for damages for intentional interference with contract, civil conspiracy, and fraudulent misrepresentation against plaintiffs, Suzanne A. Fasing, and her husband, Gregory J. Fasing (husband). Fasing cross-appeals from the entry of a judgment against her, after a bench trial, for attorney fees owed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. MuleiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Western United Realty, Inc. v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Mesa Sand & Gravel Co. v. Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Westfield Development Co. v. Rifle Investment AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Furer v. Allied Steel Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brody v. HellmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Nutting v. RAM Southwest, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- Nielson v. ScottColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. LopezColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. BrooksColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.