Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Lutz

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1992No. 91CA0412PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge HUME.

Plaintiff, Weldon Sullivan, and his attorneys, Levine and Pitler, P.C., appeal the trial court’s order assessing attorney fees against them and in favor of defendant, Harold D. Lutz. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Defendant is an attorney who began representing plaintiff at some point during the 1970s. In November 1980, defendant sent plaintiff a letter stating that the Arvada City Council was considering a lawsuit to compel the installation of a fire protection system in plaintiff’s store. Defendant also stated in his letter that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mission Denver Co. v. PiersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Pedlow v. StampSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. Haney v. City Court in & for the City of EmpireSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc. v. HeggeColorado Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. v. HowardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Colorado Citizens for Ethics in Government v. Committee for American DreamColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Anderson v. PursellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  4. Lyons v. Teamsters Local Union No. 961Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Parker v. DavisColorado Court of Appeals · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API